Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Dungeons and dragons forth edition
09-04-2007, 01:51 PM,
#1
Dungeons and dragons forth edition
has anyone read into this, or is everyone converted to the computer games now

because i want to try it out when it comes out

not that i have money for such things

but rather when it comes out, i'll see if i can get in on a local game
Reply
09-04-2007, 02:34 PM,
#2
RE: Dungeons and dragons forth edition
Quote:Originally posted by cruxvader
has anyone read into this, or is everyone converted to the computer games now

because I want to try it out when it comes out

not that I have money for such things

but rather when it comes out, i'll see if I can get in on a local game

WHAAAAAAT??? :pop:

A 4th edition of AD&D already!? :eek:
You've got to be kidding me... those guys just keep changing the rules, don't they?
First edition RULES! Second edition is acceptable if you keep some of the first edition rules, the third sucks! (altough the "to hit"system is easier in the third edition).

They should just go back to the old first edition rules, and replace the old "to hit" system, with the system from the third edition :yes:
Akavir mod leader.
Reply
09-05-2007, 12:46 AM,
#3
 
'Cause the role playing options for first edition are so perfect :no:
The soul's condition is learning to fly
Condition grounded, but determined to try
Can't keep my eyes from the circling skies
Toung-tied and twisted, just an Earth-bound misfit, I
Reply
09-05-2007, 10:15 AM,
#4
 
Oh, flashback.. But it has nothin to do with D&D ! *Starts thinking about WFRP TEW-SoB*
Hide the petals underneath that bedroom floorboard
and they will wither without fail or success.
Put the people in the hollow box they crafted,
bolt the doors and watch them perish.
Reply
09-05-2007, 11:49 AM,
#5
 
Quote:Originally posted by DarkAsmodeous
'Cause the role playing options for first edition are so perfect :no:

:no:

So have you ever played first edition? ?(

The rules were a lot simpler (role playing instead of rule playing) and they worked fine, plus the Elven Cavalier, Ranger and Barbarian classes kicked ass Cool (the second edition utterly destroyed those classes and removed the Barbarian class and the Elven Cavalier) ;(
There is no need for a trillion bizarre options like: a gnome paladin :lol: i can see it now, this tiny little garden gnome wearing full plate armor, kicking some huge pit fiend's ass back to the fiery pit it came from :lmao:
Third edition has a lot of ridiculous rules like that, the list just goes on and on, and the artwork of the Asian stuff made me feel sick :eek:

Confusedigh:
Akavir mod leader.
Reply
09-05-2007, 07:04 PM,
#6
 
I want to learn D&D. All of my friends play it and I feel left out.
Lol what?
Reply
09-06-2007, 01:23 AM,
#7
 
I've long since moved on past the D&D system, but first edition is essentialy greyhawk, while 3rd is far more of a toolbox approach, and as a DM I greatly appreciate that, I can actualy consider it as a viable option for creation of campaign settings, without having to wrestle with the rules.

I look at it as a DM, and I find the third edition approach far better in this regard, I've played 2nd edition extensively, and 1st edition a few times.
The soul's condition is learning to fly
Condition grounded, but determined to try
Can't keep my eyes from the circling skies
Toung-tied and twisted, just an Earth-bound misfit, I
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)